Head-to-Head Analysis

Energy Blend vs Dark chocolate, coconut almond

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Energy Blend

Energy Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark chocolate, coconut almond

Dark chocolate, coconut almond

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
511 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
2.1g
25g
Fat
44.7g
14.3g
Protein
12.8g
0.5g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Energy Blend and Dark chocolate, coconut almond side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Energy Blend is the clear winner. With 47 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Energy Blend contains significantly more sugar (32.14g) compared to the milder Dark chocolate, coconut almond (2.13g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark chocolate, coconut almond is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Energy Blend or Dark chocolate, coconut almond?

It depends on your goals. Energy Blend has 464 calories, while Dark chocolate, coconut almond has 511 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Energy Blend vegan?

No, Energy Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Energy Blend and Dark chocolate, coconut almond?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.