Head-to-Head Analysis

Espresso Cookie vs Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Espresso Cookie

Espresso Cookie

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz

Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
345 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
41.4g
28.6g
Fat
6.9g
7.1g
Protein
3.5g
0.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Espresso Cookie and Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Espresso Cookie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 155 more calories per 100g than Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Espresso Cookie takes the lead with only 21.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz contains 41.38g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Espresso Cookie offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Espresso Cookie or Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz?

It depends on your goals. Espresso Cookie has 500 calories, while Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz has 345 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Espresso Cookie vegan?

No, Espresso Cookie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Espresso Cookie and Nabisco newtons convenience pack cookies fig 1x6.5 oz?

There is a difference of 155 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.