Head-to-Head Analysis

Espresso Waffle Cookie vs Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Espresso Waffle Cookie

Espresso Waffle Cookie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
469 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
37.5g
Sugars
20g
18.8g
Fat
30g
6.3g
Protein
12.5g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Espresso Waffle Cookie and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Espresso Waffle Cookie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 69 more calories per 100g than Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Espresso Waffle Cookie contains significantly more sugar (37.5g) compared to the milder Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Espresso Waffle Cookie or Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

It depends on your goals. Espresso Waffle Cookie has 469 calories, while Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Espresso Waffle Cookie vegan?

No, Espresso Waffle Cookie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Espresso Waffle Cookie and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

There is a difference of 69 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.