Evaporated Filled Milk vs Sea Salt Grinder
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Evaporated Filled Milk
Sea Salt Grinder
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Evaporated Filled Milk and Sea Salt Grinder side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Evaporated Filled Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 422 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt Grinder. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Evaporated Filled Milk contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Grinder (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Grinder is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Evaporated Filled Milk offers a protein boost with 22.2g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Grinder in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Evaporated Filled Milk or Sea Salt Grinder?
It depends on your goals. Evaporated Filled Milk has 422 calories, while Sea Salt Grinder has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Evaporated Filled Milk vegan?
No, Evaporated Filled Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Evaporated Filled Milk and Sea Salt Grinder?
There is a difference of 422 calories per 100g between the two products.
