Head-to-Head Analysis

EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap vs Pickle spears Classic dill

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap

EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pickle spears Classic dill

Pickle spears Classic dill

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
237 kcal
Energy
17.9 kcal
2.6g
Sugars
0g
13.8g
Fat
0g
10.5g
Protein
0g
3.1g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap and Pickle spears Classic dill side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap is the more energy-dense option here, packing 219 more calories per 100g than Pickle spears Classic dill. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap contains significantly more sugar (2.63g) compared to the milder Pickle spears Classic dill (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pickle spears Classic dill is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap offers a protein boost with 10.5g per 100g, outperforming Pickle spears Classic dill in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap or Pickle spears Classic dill?

It depends on your goals. EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap has 237 calories, while Pickle spears Classic dill has 17.857142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap vegan?

No, EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between EverRoast Chicken Caesar Wrap and Pickle spears Classic dill?

There is a difference of 219 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.