Head-to-Head Analysis

Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers vs Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers

Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate

Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
545 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
55g
26.7g
Fat
30g
10g
Protein
7.5g
1.9g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers and Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers is the clear winner. With 45 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers takes the lead with only 2.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate contains 55g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers or Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate?

Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers vegan?

No, Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Extra Toasty Original Baked Snack Crackers and Dairy Milk Silk Bubbly Chocolate?

There is a difference of 45 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.