Head-to-Head Analysis

Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses vs Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses

Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup

Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
407 kcal
Energy
72.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.4g
32.1g
Fat
0g
25g
Protein
1.2g
1.5g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses and Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses is the more energy-dense option here, packing 335 more calories per 100g than Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup contains 5.42g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses or Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup?

It depends on your goals. Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses has 407 calories, while Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup has 72.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses vegan?

No, Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fancy Shredded Colby Jack Cheeses and Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Syrup?

There is a difference of 335 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.