Head-to-Head Analysis

Farfalle no. 93 vs No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Farfalle no. 93

Farfalle no. 93

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn

No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
48 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
1.6g
1.8g
Fat
0.4g
14.3g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Farfalle no. 93 and No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Farfalle no. 93 is the more energy-dense option here, packing 309 more calories per 100g than No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Farfalle no. 93 contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn (1.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Farfalle no. 93 offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Farfalle no. 93 or No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn?

It depends on your goals. Farfalle no. 93 has 357 calories, while No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn has 48 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Farfalle no. 93 vegan?

No, Farfalle no. 93 is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Farfalle no. 93 and No salt added super sweet whole kernel corn?

There is a difference of 309 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.