Head-to-Head Analysis

Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates vs Sandwich Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates

Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sandwich Cookies

Sandwich Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
605 kcal
Energy
226 kcal
39.5g
Sugars
0g
42.1g
Fat
10.4g
7.9g
Protein
2.1g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates and Sandwich Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates is the more energy-dense option here, packing 379 more calories per 100g than Sandwich Cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates contains significantly more sugar (39.47g) compared to the milder Sandwich Cookies (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sandwich Cookies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates offers a protein boost with 7.89g per 100g, outperforming Sandwich Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates or Sandwich Cookies?

It depends on your goals. Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates has 605 calories, while Sandwich Cookies has 226 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates vegan?

No, Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ferrero rocher, fine hazelnut chocolates and Sandwich Cookies?

There is a difference of 379 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.