Head-to-Head Analysis

Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar vs Vanilla & Strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar

Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Vanilla & Strawberry

Vanilla & Strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
280 kcal
Energy
413 kcal
8g
Sugars
24g
12g
Fat
24g
8g
Protein
5.3g
0.9g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar and Vanilla & Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar is the clear winner. With 133 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar takes the lead with only 8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vanilla & Strawberry contains 24g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Vanilla & Strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar or Vanilla & Strawberry?

Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar vegan?

No, Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fiber Now 70 Calorie Chocolate Fudge Soft Baked Bar and Vanilla & Strawberry?

There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.