Fig & Almond Bites vs Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Fig & Almond Bites
Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Fig & Almond Bites and Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Fig & Almond Bites is the clear winner. With 113 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Fig & Almond Bites contains significantly more sugar (38g) compared to the milder Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate (26.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Fig & Almond Bites or Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate?
It depends on your goals. Fig & Almond Bites has 320 calories, while Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Fig & Almond Bites vegan?
No, Fig & Almond Bites is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Fig & Almond Bites and Stauffer's, animal crackers, chocolate?
There is a difference of 113 calories per 100g between the two products.
