Head-to-Head Analysis

Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo vs Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo

Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips

Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
92.9 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.4g
Sugars
0g
2.5g
Fat
25g
12.9g
Protein
7.1g
1.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo and Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo is the clear winner. With 407 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo contains significantly more sugar (1.43g) compared to the milder Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo offers a protein boost with 12.9g per 100g, outperforming Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo or Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo has 92.9 calories, while Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo vegan?

No, Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Filipino-Style Chicken Adobo and Organic White Corn Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 407 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.