Filled Soft Cookies vs Orbit Wintermint slim pack
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Filled Soft Cookies
Orbit Wintermint slim pack
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Filled Soft Cookies and Orbit Wintermint slim pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Filled Soft Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 447 more calories per 100g than Orbit Wintermint slim pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Filled Soft Cookies contains significantly more sugar (38.7g) compared to the milder Orbit Wintermint slim pack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orbit Wintermint slim pack is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Filled Soft Cookies offers a protein boost with 3.23g per 100g, outperforming Orbit Wintermint slim pack in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Filled Soft Cookies or Orbit Wintermint slim pack?
It depends on your goals. Filled Soft Cookies has 452 calories, while Orbit Wintermint slim pack has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Filled Soft Cookies vegan?
No, Filled Soft Cookies is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Filled Soft Cookies and Orbit Wintermint slim pack?
There is a difference of 447 calories per 100g between the two products.
