Head-to-Head Analysis

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vs Chum Salmon Roe

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chum Salmon Roe

Chum Salmon Roe

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
275 kcal
Energy
40 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
2g
18.8g
Protein
5g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Chum Salmon Roe side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is the more energy-dense option here, packing 235 more calories per 100g than Chum Salmon Roe. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Chum Salmon Roe in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel or Chum Salmon Roe?

It depends on your goals. Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel has 275 calories, while Chum Salmon Roe has 40 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vegan?

No, Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Chum Salmon Roe?

There is a difference of 235 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.