Head-to-Head Analysis

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vs Solid Light Tuna In Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Solid Light Tuna In Water

Solid Light Tuna In Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
275 kcal
Energy
110 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
1g
18.8g
Protein
24g
0.9g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Solid Light Tuna In Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is the more energy-dense option here, packing 165 more calories per 100g than Solid Light Tuna In Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel or Solid Light Tuna In Water?

It depends on your goals. Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel has 275 calories, while Solid Light Tuna In Water has 110 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vegan?

No, Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Solid Light Tuna In Water?

There is a difference of 165 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.