Head-to-Head Analysis

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vs Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
275 kcal
Energy
118 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
4.1g
18.8g
Protein
20g
0.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is the more energy-dense option here, packing 157 more calories per 100g than Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel or Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel has 275 calories, while Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon has 118 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel vegan?

No, Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel and Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon?

There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.