Head-to-Head Analysis

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vs Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell

Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
522 kcal
Energy
488 kcal
0g
Sugars
53.5g
26.1g
Fat
20.9g
8.7g
Protein
11.6g
2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 34 more calories per 100g than Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell contains 53.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers or Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell?

It depends on your goals. Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers has 522 calories, while Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell has 488 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vegan?

No, Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Peanut Butter Candy in a Crunchy Shell?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.