Head-to-Head Analysis

Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates vs Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates

Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks

Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
471 kcal
Energy
60.9 kcal
105g
Sugars
2.8g
116g
Fat
2.8g
21.1g
Protein
11.1g
0.4g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates and Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates is the more energy-dense option here, packing 410 more calories per 100g than Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates contains significantly more sugar (105g) compared to the milder Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks (2.76g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates offers a protein boost with 21.1g per 100g, outperforming Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates or Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks?

It depends on your goals. Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates has 471 calories, while Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks has 60.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates vegan?

No, Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fine Hazel Nut Chocolates and Crab Smart Surimi Seafood Sticks?

There is a difference of 410 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.