Head-to-Head Analysis

Fine Hazelnut Chocolates vs Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fine Hazelnut Chocolates

Fine Hazelnut Chocolates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small)

Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
40g
Sugars
3.6g
44g
Fat
32.1g
8g
Protein
3.6g
0.2g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fine Hazelnut Chocolates and Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fine Hazelnut Chocolates is the more energy-dense option here, packing 64 more calories per 100g than Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small). If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fine Hazelnut Chocolates contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small) (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small) is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fine Hazelnut Chocolates offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small) in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fine Hazelnut Chocolates or Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small)?

It depends on your goals. Fine Hazelnut Chocolates has 600 calories, while Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small) has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fine Hazelnut Chocolates vegan?

No, Fine Hazelnut Chocolates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fine Hazelnut Chocolates and Pringles Salt And Vinegar (small)?

There is a difference of 64 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.