Head-to-Head Analysis

Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic vs French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic

Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer

French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
24.4 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
6.7g
0.8g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic and French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic is the clear winner. With 42 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic contains significantly more sugar (2.44g) compared to the milder French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic or French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer?

It depends on your goals. Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic has 24.4 calories, while French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer has 66.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic vegan?

No, Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fire Roasted Diced Tomatoes With Garlic and French Vanilla Almond + Coconut Creamer?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.