Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes vs Chicken Hot Links
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes
Chicken Hot Links
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes and Chicken Hot Links side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes is the clear winner. With 125 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes contains significantly more sugar (4.48g) compared to the milder Chicken Hot Links (2.42g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Hot Links is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes or Chicken Hot Links?
It depends on your goals. Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes has 80 calories, while Chicken Hot Links has 205 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes vegan?
No, Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes and Chicken Hot Links?
There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.
