Head-to-Head Analysis

Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes vs Lowfat Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes

Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lowfat Milk

Lowfat Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
80 kcal
Energy
45.8 kcal
4.5g
Sugars
5g
0g
Fat
1g
1.3g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes and Lowfat Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 34 more calories per 100g than Lowfat Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes or Lowfat Milk?

It depends on your goals. Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes has 80 calories, while Lowfat Milk has 45.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes vegan?

No, Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fire Roasted Sweet Potatoes and Lowfat Milk?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.