Head-to-Head Analysis

Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce vs Roasted red pepper hummus snacker

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce

Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Roasted red pepper hummus snacker

Roasted red pepper hummus snacker

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
56.5 kcal
Energy
287 kcal
4.8g
Sugars
0.8g
1.6g
Fat
14.7g
1.6g
Protein
7.8g
0.9g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce and Roasted red pepper hummus snacker side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce is the clear winner. With 231 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce contains significantly more sugar (4.8387096774194g) compared to the milder Roasted red pepper hummus snacker (0.775g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Roasted red pepper hummus snacker is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce or Roasted red pepper hummus snacker?

It depends on your goals. Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce has 56.451612903226 calories, while Roasted red pepper hummus snacker has 287 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce vegan?

No, Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fire roasted tomato & garlic pasta sauce and Roasted red pepper hummus snacker?

There is a difference of 231 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.