Head-to-Head Analysis

Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers vs Springtime Truffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers

Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Springtime Truffles

Springtime Truffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers and Springtime Truffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 321 more calories per 100g than Springtime Truffles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Springtime Truffles (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Springtime Truffles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Springtime Truffles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers or Springtime Truffles?

It depends on your goals. Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers has 321 calories, while Springtime Truffles has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers vegan?

No, Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Firehook Multi grain Za'atar Crackers and Springtime Truffles?

There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.