Head-to-Head Analysis

Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet vs Caramel hard candies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet

Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Caramel hard candies

Caramel hard candies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
181 kcal
Energy
312 kcal
1g
Sugars
0g
7.9g
Fat
6.3g
12g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet and Caramel hard candies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet is the clear winner. With 131 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet offers a protein boost with 12g per 100g, outperforming Caramel hard candies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet or Caramel hard candies?

It depends on your goals. Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet has 181 calories, while Caramel hard candies has 312 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet vegan?

No, Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fischstäbchen aus saftigem Alaksa-Seelachsfilet and Caramel hard candies?

There is a difference of 131 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.