Head-to-Head Analysis

Fish vs Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fish

Fish

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added

Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
208 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1g
Sugars
0g
9.4g
Fat
0g
11.5g
Protein
0g
1.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fish and Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fish is the more energy-dense option here, packing 208 more calories per 100g than Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fish contains significantly more sugar (1.04g) compared to the milder Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fish offers a protein boost with 11.5g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fish or Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added?

It depends on your goals. Fish has 208 calories, while Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fish vegan?

No, Fish is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fish and Sweet Gherkins No Sugar Added?

There is a difference of 208 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.