Head-to-Head Analysis

Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber vs Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber

Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
128 kcal
Energy
330 kcal
0g
Sugars
36.7g
6g
Fat
1.7g
10g
Protein
3.3g
1.9g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber is the clear winner. With 202 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored contains 36.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber or Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber vegan?

No, Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fish Paste Mixed With Sea Cucumber and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

There is a difference of 202 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.