Head-to-Head Analysis

Fish Roe Lucky Bag vs Simply Ruffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fish Roe Lucky Bag

Fish Roe Lucky Bag

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Simply Ruffles

Simply Ruffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
213 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
2.7g
Sugars
3.6g
13.3g
Fat
35.7g
13.3g
Protein
7.1g
1.8g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fish Roe Lucky Bag and Simply Ruffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fish Roe Lucky Bag is the clear winner. With 358 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Fish Roe Lucky Bag offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Simply Ruffles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fish Roe Lucky Bag or Simply Ruffles?

Fish Roe Lucky Bag appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Fish Roe Lucky Bag vegan?

No, Fish Roe Lucky Bag is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fish Roe Lucky Bag and Simply Ruffles?

There is a difference of 358 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.