Head-to-Head Analysis

Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken vs Mini Chips Ahoy!

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken

Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mini Chips Ahoy!

Mini Chips Ahoy!

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
484 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
22.6g
18.8g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken and Mini Chips Ahoy! side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken is the clear winner. With 366 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Mini Chips Ahoy! (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mini Chips Ahoy! is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Mini Chips Ahoy! in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken or Mini Chips Ahoy!?

It depends on your goals. Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken has 118 calories, while Mini Chips Ahoy! has 484 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken vegan?

No, Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Flame Seared Chargrilled Chipotle Chicken and Mini Chips Ahoy!?

There is a difference of 366 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.