Head-to-Head Analysis

Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp vs smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp

Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
28.6g
7.1g
Protein
3.6g
2.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than smooth Mint in Dark chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder smooth Mint in Dark chocolate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, smooth Mint in Dark chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming smooth Mint in Dark chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp or smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp has 500 calories, while smooth Mint in Dark chocolate has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp vegan?

No, Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Flamin' hot flamin' hot imp and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.