Head-to-Head Analysis

Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple vs Assortment Of European Chocolates

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple

Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Assortment Of European Chocolates

Assortment Of European Chocolates

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
560 kcal
24.6g
Sugars
48g
10.8g
Fat
32g
18.5g
Protein
8g
1.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple and Assortment Of European Chocolates side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple is the clear winner. With 160 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple takes the lead with only 24.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Assortment Of European Chocolates contains 48g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Assortment Of European Chocolates in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple or Assortment Of European Chocolates?

Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple vegan?

No, Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple and Assortment Of European Chocolates?

There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.