Head-to-Head Analysis

Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy vs California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy

Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts

California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
667 kcal
Energy
83.3 kcal
167g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
6.7g
0g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy and California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 584 more calories per 100g than California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy contains significantly more sugar (167g) compared to the milder California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy or California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts?

It depends on your goals. Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy has 667 calories, while California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts has 83.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy vegan?

No, Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy and California Style Marinated Artichoke Hearts?

There is a difference of 584 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.