Head-to-Head Analysis

Franks vs Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Franks

Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices

Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
325 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
1.8g
27.5g
Fat
3.6g
10g
Protein
16.1g
2.9g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Franks and Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 218 more calories per 100g than Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Franks or Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices?

It depends on your goals. Franks has 325 calories, while Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Franks vegan?

No, Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Franks and Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices?

There is a difference of 218 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.