Head-to-Head Analysis

French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls vs SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls

French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish

SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
458 kcal
Energy
273 kcal
45.8g
Sugars
4.6g
18.8g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls and SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 185 more calories per 100g than SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls contains significantly more sugar (45.8g) compared to the milder SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish (4.55g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls or SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls has 458 calories, while SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish has 273 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls vegan?

No, French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between French Vanilla Créme Filled Wafer Rolls and SmartSweets Minis Mini Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 185 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.