Head-to-Head Analysis

Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers vs Fig & Walnut Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers

Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fig & Walnut Bites

Fig & Walnut Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
340 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
38g
5.4g
Fat
16g
7.1g
Protein
6g
3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers and Fig & Walnut Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than Fig & Walnut Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers takes the lead with only 7.14g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fig & Walnut Bites contains 38g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers or Fig & Walnut Bites?

It depends on your goals. Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers has 393 calories, while Fig & Walnut Bites has 340 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers vegan?

No, Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fretzel Crisps Garlic Parmesan Thin, Crunchy Pretzel Crackers and Fig & Walnut Bites?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.