Head-to-Head Analysis

Fridge Pot Tuna Steak vs Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fridge Pot Tuna Steak

Fridge Pot Tuna Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon

Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
126 kcal
Energy
79.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1g
Fat
1.8g
29g
Protein
15.9g
0.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fridge Pot Tuna Steak and Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fridge Pot Tuna Steak is the more energy-dense option here, packing 46 more calories per 100g than Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Fridge Pot Tuna Steak offers a protein boost with 29g per 100g, outperforming Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fridge Pot Tuna Steak or Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon?

It depends on your goals. Fridge Pot Tuna Steak has 126 calories, while Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon has 79.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fridge Pot Tuna Steak vegan?

No, Fridge Pot Tuna Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fridge Pot Tuna Steak and Wild caught pacific skinless salmon fillets, salmon?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.