Head-to-Head Analysis

Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken vs ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken

Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS

ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
78.1 kcal
Energy
278 kcal
3g
Sugars
0g
1.7g
Fat
23.2g
9.3g
Protein
16.6g
0.7g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken and ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken is the clear winner. With 200 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken contains significantly more sugar (2.97g) compared to the milder ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken or ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS?

It depends on your goals. Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken has 78.1 calories, while ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS has 278 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken vegan?

No, Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Frozen bowl teriyaki style chicken and ORIGINAL 100% USDA CHOICE BEEF CHUCK BURGERS?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.