Head-to-Head Analysis

Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered vs Barbecue potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered

Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Barbecue potato chips

Barbecue potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
317 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
28.2g
Sugars
7.1g
17.6g
Fat
35.7g
3.5g
Protein
3.6g
0.1g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered and Barbecue potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered is the clear winner. With 219 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered contains significantly more sugar (28.2g) compared to the milder Barbecue potato chips (7.14286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Barbecue potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered or Barbecue potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered has 317 calories, while Barbecue potato chips has 535.71429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered vegan?

No, Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Frozen strawberries milk and white chocolate covered and Barbecue potato chips?

There is a difference of 219 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.