Head-to-Head Analysis

Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar vs Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar

Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers

Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
32.4g
Sugars
0g
8.1g
Fat
0g
5.4g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar and Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 351 more calories per 100g than Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar contains significantly more sugar (32.432432432432g) compared to the milder Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar offers a protein boost with 5.4054054054054g per 100g, outperforming Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar or Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers?

It depends on your goals. Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar has 351.35135135135 calories, while Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar vegan?

No, Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fruit and Grain Soft Baked Bar and Zesty Dill Pickle Slicers?

There is a difference of 351 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.