Head-to-Head Analysis

Fruit by the Foot vs Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fruit by the Foot

Fruit by the Foot

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
381 kcal
Energy
321 kcal
47.6g
Sugars
17.9g
4.8g
Fat
7.1g
0g
Protein
10.7g
0.6g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fruit by the Foot and Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fruit by the Foot is the more energy-dense option here, packing 60 more calories per 100g than Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fruit by the Foot contains significantly more sugar (47.6g) compared to the milder Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls (17.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fruit by the Foot or Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls?

It depends on your goals. Fruit by the Foot has 381 calories, while Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls has 321 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fruit by the Foot vegan?

No, Fruit by the Foot is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fruit by the Foot and Original Hawaiian Sweet Rolls?

There is a difference of 60 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.