Head-to-Head Analysis

Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours vs Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours

Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
385 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
67.3g
Sugars
0g
3.9g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0.3g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours and Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours is the clear winner. With 79 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours contains significantly more sugar (67.31g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours or Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours has 385 calories, while Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours vegan?

No, Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fruit Chews, Minis, Sours and Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 79 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.