Head-to-Head Analysis

Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts vs Sliced Water Chestnuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts

Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Water Chestnuts

Sliced Water Chestnuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
406 kcal
Energy
42.9 kcal
32.3g
Sugars
1.4g
17.7g
Fat
0g
3.9g
Protein
0.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts and Sliced Water Chestnuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 363 more calories per 100g than Sliced Water Chestnuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts contains significantly more sugar (32.3g) compared to the milder Sliced Water Chestnuts (1.43g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Water Chestnuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts offers a protein boost with 3.85g per 100g, outperforming Sliced Water Chestnuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts or Sliced Water Chestnuts?

It depends on your goals. Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts has 406 calories, while Sliced Water Chestnuts has 42.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts vegan?

No, Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fudge Brownie With English Walnuts and Sliced Water Chestnuts?

There is a difference of 363 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.