Head-to-Head Analysis

Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt vs Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt

Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores

Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
280 kcal
Energy
407 kcal
8g
Sugars
29.6g
12g
Fat
14.8g
8g
Protein
3.7g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt and Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt is the clear winner. With 127 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt takes the lead with only 8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores contains 29.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt or Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores?

Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt vegan?

No, Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fudge brownies chocolate bars net wt and Golden Grahams Soft Baked Oat Bars S'Mores?

There is a difference of 127 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.