Head-to-Head Analysis

Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss vs Old fashioned donut holes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss

Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Old fashioned donut holes

Old fashioned donut holes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
477.9 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
37.2g
Sugars
26.8g
31.9g
Fat
17.9g
10.6g
Protein
3.6g
0.4g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss and Old fashioned donut holes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss is the more energy-dense option here, packing 85 more calories per 100g than Old fashioned donut holes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss contains significantly more sugar (37.16814159292g) compared to the milder Old fashioned donut holes (26.8g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Old fashioned donut holes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss offers a protein boost with 10.61946902654g per 100g, outperforming Old fashioned donut holes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss or Old fashioned donut holes?

It depends on your goals. Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss has 477.8761061946 calories, while Old fashioned donut holes has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss vegan?

No, Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fudge - Peanut Butter Bliss and Old fashioned donut holes?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.