Head-to-Head Analysis

Fuji Apple Slices vs Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fuji Apple Slices

Fuji Apple Slices

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal

Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
352.9 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
73.5g
Sugars
1.8g
0g
Fat
5.3g
2.9g
Protein
14g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fuji Apple Slices and Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fuji Apple Slices is the more energy-dense option here, packing 20 more calories per 100g than Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fuji Apple Slices contains significantly more sugar (73.529411764706g) compared to the milder Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal (1.75g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fuji Apple Slices or Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal?

It depends on your goals. Fuji Apple Slices has 352.94117647059 calories, while Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fuji Apple Slices vegan?

No, Fuji Apple Slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fuji Apple Slices and Ezekiel 4:9 - Golden Flax - Sprouted whole grain cereal?

There is a difference of 20 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.