Head-to-Head Analysis

Fuji Apple Slices vs Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fuji Apple Slices

Fuji Apple Slices

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
352.9 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
73.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
2.9g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fuji Apple Slices and Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fuji Apple Slices is the more energy-dense option here, packing 353 more calories per 100g than Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fuji Apple Slices contains significantly more sugar (73.529411764706g) compared to the milder Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fuji Apple Slices offers a protein boost with 2.9411764705882g per 100g, outperforming Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fuji Apple Slices or Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

It depends on your goals. Fuji Apple Slices has 352.94117647059 calories, while Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fuji Apple Slices vegan?

No, Fuji Apple Slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fuji Apple Slices and Fall Blend Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

There is a difference of 353 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.