Head-to-Head Analysis

Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta vs Hot Chili Peppers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta

Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hot Chili Peppers

Hot Chili Peppers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta and Hot Chili Peppers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta is the more energy-dense option here, packing 342 more calories per 100g than Hot Chili Peppers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Hot Chili Peppers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hot Chili Peppers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta offers a protein boost with 10.71g per 100g, outperforming Hot Chili Peppers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta or Hot Chili Peppers?

It depends on your goals. Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta has 375 calories, while Hot Chili Peppers has 33.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta vegan?

No, Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta and Hot Chili Peppers?

There is a difference of 342 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.