Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta vs Lucky Charms
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta
Lucky Charms
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta and Lucky Charms side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta is the clear winner. With 14 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lucky Charms contains 33.333333333333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta offers a protein boost with 10.71g per 100g, outperforming Lucky Charms in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta or Lucky Charms?
Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta vegan?
No, Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Fusilli no. 27, 100% whole wheat pasta and Lucky Charms?
There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.
