Head-to-Head Analysis

Fusilli no. 34 vs Valencia short grain rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fusilli no. 34

Fusilli no. 34

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Valencia short grain rice

Valencia short grain rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
356 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0g
14.3g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fusilli no. 34 and Valencia short grain rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fusilli no. 34 is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1 more calories per 100g than Valencia short grain rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fusilli no. 34 contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Valencia short grain rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Valencia short grain rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Fusilli no. 34 offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Valencia short grain rice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fusilli no. 34 or Valencia short grain rice?

It depends on your goals. Fusilli no. 34 has 357 calories, while Valencia short grain rice has 356 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fusilli no. 34 vegan?

No, Fusilli no. 34 is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fusilli no. 34 and Valencia short grain rice?

There is a difference of 1 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.