Head-to-Head Analysis

GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales vs Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales

GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond

Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.3g
0g
Fat
10g
0g
Protein
10g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales and Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales is the clear winner. With 433 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond contains 3.3333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales or Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond?

GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales vegan?

No, GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between GARBANZOS con Carne de CERDO en salsa de vegetales and Blue diamond nutthins sriracha flavored almond?

There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.